Anti-bribery laws in the U.S: Ethics and Airbus Essay -- internationa

International worry is risky especially when companies manifold play by a different set of rules. Knowing the differences in culture, politics and the primary legal environments of a host country, allows the companies to support line of reasoning and make quality decisions based on the business climate, creating a market mix specific to each country and region (CSU, module 3, 2014). little research helps companies create a solid market mix, but does not guarantee that the obstacles of payoffs and bribery wont deflect the outcome. Below the surface level of legion(predicate) sales negotiations, like those seen in our case study of Boeing and Airbus, are driven not on their marketing mix, quality, reputation or reach, but rather on power, bribery, politics and corruption, which plays a very real role in international business negotiations. Anti-bribery laws in the U.S. were established to prevent the rampant corruption exhibited in the Airbus case study. standardised anti-corruption laws do not exist in many of the host countries the U.S. does business with. Host countys laws and regulations take on different forms especially when power, bullion and politics are involved, manipulating or creating a new set of rules to clear their own selfish needs. Savvy sales negotiators, like those at Airbus, search opportunities finished loop holes, off shore accounts and large sums of bribery money, to influence country officials or others with the authority to make purchases to commit to Airbus. A more than uniform worldwide approach to international laws needs to be adapted, utilize and more importantly enforced, so all companies involved can conduct fair business practices under the same set of rules. Legal or Illegal who Benefits Airbus and... ...d sets the foundation for companies to mitigate disputes through conciliation, arbitration, or, as a uttermost resort, litigation. Most international businesspeople prefer a settlement through arbitration rather than by suing a foreign company (Cateora, Gilly & Graham, 2013). ground on marketing strategy, had Airbus adopted anti bribery laws prior to the many cases in question, the outcome might not be favorable to them. It would not have been in the best interest of Airbus to follow commonly accepted business practices established by the U.S.. Works CitedCateora, P., Gilly, M., & Graham, J. (2013). International Marketing sixteenth edition New York, N.Y Mc Graw-Hill Irwin companies, Inc. Colorado State University-Global Campus. (2010). Case 2-4 - value orientation and Airbus Blackboard ecourse. In MKG 400 International and Multi-Cultural Marketing. Greenwood Village, CO.