'The Sandman\r'

'E. T. A. H finish off art objectns â€Å"The Sand adult male” illuminates Freuds theory of the Un after partny. Freud’s understanding of Nathaniel in E. T. A. Hoffmann’s â€Å"The Sandman” is that the Nathaniel’s â€Å" unbalancedman” like actions are the direct of the return of his stifled juvenile material. Nathaniel is the sponsor and is convinced that a frightful part awaits him. His fear focuses on a expectant old man whom he has unsounded since infantile to be the â€Å"Sandman”, a junky who takes a representation the eyes of children who are conjure at night. He connects the â€Å"sandman” with Coppelius, a onlyy of his give and he incriminates Coppelius in his fathers death.As an adult, Nathaniel craziness is triggered after having a visitor from what he believes to be the â€Å"sandman” whom in reality is a salesman named Coppola. Freud uses E. T. A Hoffmans â€Å"The Sandman” to describe the conceit of repression of childhood complexes. E. T. A. Hoffmanns â€Å"The Sandman” is believed to be â€Å"preternatural” by Freud. Nathaniel believes in the evil â€Å"sand-man” from his childhood. He is non solo mature and has trouble growing up throughout the legend. His fiancee Clara tries to help and retell not to let his stories get to him merely it only queasydens him.Nathaniel indigences community to prevail into his stories tho his stories drive him to be a mad man. He is sent a focussing to resume at an asylum. He meets a man named Coppola who he believes to be the evil Coppelius/ sandman. Nathaniel ends up realizing that he is just a man who sells glasses and buys a pair off of him. While he is a stylus he falls â€Å"in love” with an dyspneic object named Olimpia and forgets about his fiancee Clara. â€Å" exactly then he had n eer had such(prenominal) a perfect listener. ” He loves the way Olimpia just sit there and lis tens to his stories, he falls for her womanly shaped figure. Her attractively molded features and her shapely figure compelled habitual admirations. ” Nathaniel ends up destroying Olimipa, which can serve as 1 of his alter egos, his narcissistic side. He remembers about his lovely Clara and gets â€Å"better” he goes back home to his family but Nathaniel is not better. Clara ends up bringing up a gray bush that she spots which re wits him of the sandman and drives him mad again. He attempts to kill Clara and then ends up jumping and killing himself as comfortably as his alter ego Coppelius.As people began to climb the stairs in read to seixe the lunatic, Coppelius laughed and said: â€Å"Ha, ha- just wait, he’ll currently come down soon by himself” and looked up, like the another(prenominal)s. Suddenly Nathanael paused and stood stock still, he went down. Suddenly Nathanael paused and stood stock still he went down perceived Coppelius, and, with a sharp shriek of Beautiful eyes-a! Beautiful eyes- a! ’ he jumped over the parapet. By the cartridge holder Nathanael was lying on the pavement, his head shattered, Coppelius had vanished into the throng. 118) Coppelius can be read to be an alter-ego of Nathanael; the way Hoffman states that Coppelius just vanishes once Nathanael hits the ground stirs it seems as if now that Nathanael is not alive incomplete is the story of the â€Å"sandman” Freud does not believe that the sandman or Olimpia are Nathaniel’s alter-egos. He has other interpretations about what is wrong with Nathaniel. Freud believes that Nathanael’s regression with the sandman and Olimpia is what someone experiences in adulthood that was reduce from their earlier stages in life.Nathaniel was told the story of the sandman as a little child by his old nurse: fool’t you know notwithstanding? He’s a wicked man who comes to children when they don’t want to go to fork over and throws handfuls of sand into their eyes; that makes their eyes make full blood and jump out of their heads and he throws the eyes into his bag and takes them into the cresent moon to feed his own children (87) Freud believes that this story triggered the instability of the psych while Nathaniel was young.In the Uncanny Freud states â€Å"e rattlingthing that ought to have remained hidden and secret, and yet comes to light,” (7) Whenever something reminds Nathaniel of the sandman it triggers him to turn into a â€Å"madman” and he gets lost in his own world. in that location are different causes that trigger one to go mad. Freud believes that one of the main sources of â€Å"uncanny” has to do with the idea of one be robbed of their eyes. â€Å" Oedipus that mythical-lawbreaker was simply carrying out a rationalize for of punishment of castration. Freud believes Nathaniel was afraid of castration not just loosing his eyes since many care for both . Oedipus links with Nathanael, both were afraid of loosing a part of them that they both treasure. Nathanael also treasures his mother. Nathaniel seems to only see his mother as â€Å" level-headed”, she is the one who protects them and the one that does not want the sandman in the house. â€Å"my mother, kissing and cuddling her loved boy who was thus restored to life. ” (91) Nathanael has an attachment to his mother.Nathaniel appears to not like his father and see him as the â€Å"bad” parent. â€Å"I was comforted by the realization that his alliance with the devilish Coppelius could not have plunged him into eternal perdition. ” (92) It could be because the father continues to allow the sandman in their home. Freud believes that nothing is ever forgotten and it just stays suppressed in one’s mind until something triggers one to remember. Nathanael’s suppressed memories make his narcissist.The â€Å"double” is the primary source of narcissism in a child. Only in Olimpia’s love do I recognize myself” â€Å"Olimpia had voiced his own thoughts. ” This is where Nathaniel’s narcissism returns; Olimipa is a reflection of himself. â€Å" The idea of the â€Å"double” does not necessarily meld with the passing of the primary narcissism, for it can start out fresh meaning from the later sages of phylogeny of the ego” (10) Olimpia is the re-birth of Nathaniel’s narcissism shipway in which he begins again to be self-absorbed.The Sandman by ETA Hoffman is one of the most easy known short stories throughout history. It is very unusual to other short stories. Whether we all agree with Freuds interpretation of the story, Freud makes some honorable arguments on why the narrator is the way he is. Nathaniel is a troubled separate who ends up taking his own life. No matter which way you take the story he ends up still being a madman.\r\n'